State v. Rivers
State v. Rivers, 160 So. 3d 1108 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015).
Cited by
- State v. Johnson 187 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Lombard 486 So. 2d 106
Opinion text
BONIN, J., concurs with additional reasons. |,I concur, but write to make explicit that the precise and proper question for a reviewing court to answer (which the majority opinion correctly answers) when the defendant’s claim, as here, is that he is entitled to a conviction of only the lesser, responsive verdict of manslaughter in a second degree murder prosecution is: “In reviewing defendant’s claim, [the review- *1113 mg] court must determine whether a rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found that the mitigatory factors were not established by a preponderance of the evidence.” State v. Lombard, 486 So.2d 106, 111 (La.1986).