Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Farrier, 162 So. 3d 1233.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Scott J. Ledet La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 3/25/15), State v. Golden, 2011- 0735, p. 12 (La.
State of Lousisiana Versus Hoang M. Le La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 3/25/15), the defendant was convicted of sexual battery on a six-year-old, unrelated child, who resided with him in the same house.
State of Louisiana Versus Edin O. Melgar La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 3/25/15), the defendant was convicted of sexual battery on a six-year-old, unrelated child, who resided with him in the same house.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Peterson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 3/25/15), the defendant was convicted of sexual battery of an unrelated, six-year old girl who resided with him in the same home; on appeal, he argued that the trial court erred in admitting a jailhouse telephone recording, in which he made statements about watching child pornography, because it was substantially more prej
State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Luper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4th Cir. 3/ 25/ 15), - 43 ( a recording of defendant' s phone conversation while in custody, wherein he stated that the victim and three others had caught him watching child pornography on his computer, that he cannot fight this," and that he hoped for leniency as " a first offender," was deemed relevant in his trial f
State v. Parvez 249 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/25/15), , 1243.
State v. Taylor 247 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/25/15), , 1240.
Schwarzenberger v. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans 226 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2017
State ex rel. Farrier v. State 214 So. 3d 847 La. 2017
Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard 197 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 3/25/15), (“By explicitly finding that the opinion testimony of Dr. McAuliff would only serve to confuse the jury, the trial judge answered the critical question that this testimony would not be helpful and | ^excluded the testimony.”).
State v. Hampton 183 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 3/25/15), , 1239 .
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Trung Le 188 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 3/25/14), (citing State v. Hampton, 13-0580, p, 2 (La.App.