State ex rel. Doming v. State
State ex rel. Doming v. State, 161 So. 3d 646 (La. 2015).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Avenal v. State 678 So. 2d 536
- State v. Wiggins 666 So. 2d 661
Opinion text
In re Doming, Dennis; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 10-2138; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 14-KH-328. *647 Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because the terms of the statute under which relator was sentenced do not include a prohibition on parole, see R.S. 14:100; R.S. 15:529.1, the district court is directed to resentence relator to a term which does not include such a prohibition. Relator’s parole eligibility is to be determined by the Department of Corrections pursuant to R.S. 15:574.4. St. Amant v. 19th J.D.C., 94-0567 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 536 ; cf. State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661 .