Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 181 So. 3d 631.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Javontie Marks La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
9/ 18/ 15), per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Shavis Breon Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Explained State Of Louisiana v. Elzie Ball La. 2020
9/18/15), another post-conviction capital case, we explained that an “attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post- conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing.” As we found in Lee, those of Ball’s post-conviction ineffective ass
State Of Louisiana v. Sareel Poindexter La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
9/ 18/ 15), ( per curlam).
Explained State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
9/18/15), , 638, another post-conviction capital case, we explained that an "attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing."
Explained State v. Reeves 254 So. 3d 665 La. 2018
9/18/15), , 638, another post-conviction capital case, we explained that an "attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing."
State v. Broadway 252 So. 3d 878 La. 2018
9/18/15), , 638 (an attempt "to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing."); State v. Williams , , 256-57 (La.
State v. Magee 237 So. 3d 1182 La. 2018
9/18/15), , 638 (an "attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing").
State ex rel. Thomas v. State 219 So. 3d 323 La. 2017
9/18/15), (attempt “to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it ás a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing.”).
Explained State v. Chester 208 So. 3d 338 La. 2016
9/18/15), , another capital post-conviction case, we explained that an attempt to re-litigate a claim previously disposed of, by couching it as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, will generally fail because the underlying issue has already been fully litigated.
State v. Duhe 202 So. 3d 475 La. 2016
9/18/15), (an “attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing.”).
State v. Hayes 204 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Explained State v. Blank 192 So. 3d 93 La. 2016
In State v. Lee, 14-2374, pp. 8-9 (La.9/18/15), , another post-conviction capital case, we explained that an “attempt to re-litigate a claim that has been previously disposed of, by couching it as a post-conviction ineffective assistance of counsel claim, [should be] generally unavailing.” As we found in Lee , those of Blank’s post-conviction ineffective assis
State v. Hampton 183 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
to test the reliability of expert testimony.”); but see State v. Lee, 14-2374, p. 7 (La.9/18/15), (suggesting in l12connection with DNA evidence that a trial judge is required to perform its ga-tekeeping function).