No. 2015 CA 1159
Precedential
Processed
Temple v. Morgan
Temple v. Morgan, 196 So. 3d 71 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016).
Cited by
- Craig Aucoin v. Sheriff Jerry J. Larpenter, ex officio as the Terrebonne Parish Sheriff; … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- Russell v. City of Baton Rouge 271 So. 3d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Minix v. City of Rayne 243 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Allen B. Minix and Kendra Minix, Etc. v. City of Rayne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Batiste v. United Fire & Cas. Co. 241 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Raborn v. Albea 221 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Bryant v. Premium Food Concepts, Inc. 220 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Williams v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. 217 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Trelles v. Continental Casualty Co. 211 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Stafford v. Exxon Mobile Corp. 212 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Shields v. Alvin R. Savoie & Associates, Inc. 214 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Cheramie v. Port Fourchon Marina, Inc. 211 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Opinion text
PETTIGREW, J.,. dissents, and assigns reasons. 1 iThe innocent of the state, beware of the minefield known as “open and obvious.” In my opinion, the trial court and majority have improperly weighed evidence and made credibility determinations on a motion for summary judgment. After a review, of the record, and based .upon direct and circumstantial evidence introduced, there are material issues of fact outstanding that preclude the granting of a summary judgment. I would reverse the trial court.