Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baker v. Harrah's, 190 So. 3d 379.
-
Daphne Reissland v. Valluzzo Companies, LLC
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), (citing Resweber v. Haroil Constr.
-
Mark Shubert v. City of New Orleans
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), (citing Poissenot v. St.
-
Cembell Industries, Inc. & the Gray Insurance Company v. Kevin Smith
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), Molinere v. Vinson Guard Serv., Inc., 05-0116 (La.
- Kenneth Prevost v. City of New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Floyd Safford v. New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
-
Stephen K. Lentz v. City of New Orleans, Police Department
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), (citing Authement v. Shappert Engineering, 2002-1631, p. 12 (La.
- Geneva Hebert v. the Fresh Market, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
-
Evans v. Evans
247 So. 3d 120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), , 388 ).
- Terrell Talbot v. Mouton Plumbing and Hauling, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Terrell Talbot v. Mouton Plumbing and Hauling, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- Talbot v. Mouton Plumbing & Hauling, Inc. 244 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Hamilton v. GCA Servs. Grp., Inc.
243 So. 3d 51
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), , 396, writ denied, 2016-0659 (La.
-
Wilson v. Wilson
237 So. 3d 1208
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 03/09/16), , 389, writ denied , 16-659 (La.
- Sanchez v. AIG Insurance & Memco, Inc. 230 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Martinez v. Rames
224 So. 3d 467
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), , writ denied, 16-0659 (La.
- Thibodaux v. Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc. 207 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
Brown v. Chategnier
208 So. 3d 410
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
*414 App. 4 Cir. 3/9/16), .
-
Tolley v. James Construction Group, LLC
202 So. 3d 1044
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 3/9/16), , 386“Application of the manifest error standard of review does not however, mandate the affirmance of a lower court decision with respect to findings of fact.” Alexander, 630 So.2d at 710.