No. 2015-CC-0147
Precedential
Granted
Processed
Chicas v. Doe
Chicas v. Doe, 166 So. 3d 238 (La. 2015).
Cited by
- Charlyne R. Alfred v. Joseph J. Trapp, US Agencies Casualty Insurance Company and State … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
- Martin Baack and Brenda Baack v. Michael McIntosh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- In re Hardee 259 So. 3d 329 La. 2018
- William Weems v. Houston Specialty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Weems v. Houston Specialty Ins. Co. 222 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. h Granted. The regulations of the Commissioner of Insurance, as contained in LDOI Bulletin 08-02, provide for a box on the UM selection form which the insurer may use for policy information purposes, such as policy number, binder number, application number, etc. The regulations further provide, “[t]his box does not need to be filled in for the form to be properly completed.” In light of this provision, the absence of a blank box for the policy number does not create a question of fact concerning the form’s validity. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and summary judgment is granted in favor of relator.