No. 2015-KH-1858
Precedential
Processed
State ex rel. Landry v. State
Also decided on this docket: La., March 31, 2017 217 So. 3d 364
State ex rel. Landry v. State, 207 So. 3d 394 (La. 2016).
Opinion text
PER CURIAM: | denied. Relator has failed to set forth a valid ground for recusal and therefore shows no error in the lower courts’ rulings. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 671. We attach hereto and make a part hereof the District Court’s written reasons denying relator’s motion. Attachment *395 [[Image here]]