Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman
Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman, 170 So. 3d 972 (La. 2015).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Barnard v. Barnard 675 So. 2d 734
Opinion text
In re Alise Durand; Douglas J. Du-rand; — Defendant(s); Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. N, No. 2013-11628; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-1416. Granted. Although the trial court set the return date more than thirty days from the date of the ruling, the court has authority to extend the deadline under Rule 4-3. Relators’ application, filed within the time limit authorized by the trial court, is timely. See Barnard, v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), 675 So.2d 734 . Accordingly, the ruling of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the application is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.