Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ardoin v. Calcasieu Parish School Board, 192 So. 3d 738.
- Brandon Broussard v. Structural Preservation Systems,llc New Hampshire Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Bayou Shrimp Processors, Inc. and Bridgefield Employers Insurance Company v. Shelly Delahoussaye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
-
Kimberly Bryant Versus Ray Brandt Dodge, Inc. and Amtrust North America, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
5/27/16), 6 If the plaintiff fails to prove any one of these elements, the claim fails.
- Cheryl A. McCain v. Motel 6 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
-
Szewczyk v. Party Planners W., Inc.
274 So. 3d 57
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/27/16), , the court affirmed summary judgment for a store where the customer failed to establish why a bench collapsed or what defect allegedly existed, as it could have been caused by improper assembly, improper maintenance, or manufacturer negligence; mere speculation was insufficient.
- Hewitt v. Lafayette City-Parish Consol. Gov't 243 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Lonnie Harper v. Boise Paper Holdings, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/27/16), (alterations in original).
-
Harper v. Boise Paper Holdings, LLC
258 So. 3d 651
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/27/16), (alterations in original).
- Arrant v. Wayne Acree Pls, Inc. 218 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
Clifford Joseph Ledet v. Cetco Oilfield Services Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/27/16), : Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 2–12.4 further provides that “[a]ll specifications or assignments of error must be briefed” and that the “court may consider as abandoned any specification or assignment 7 of error which has not been briefed.” B
-
Ledet v. Cetco Oilfield Services Co.
209 So. 3d 896
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/27/16), : Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4 further provides that “[a]ll specifications or assignments of error must be briefed” and that the “court may consider as abandoned any specification or assignment |Kof error which has not been briefed.” Based upon that rule, this court has time and again stated that “[w]
-
Alvin Bartley v. Schlumberger Technology Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/27/16), (quoting George v. Guillory, 00-591, p. 13 (La.App.
-
Bartley v. Schlumberger Technology Co.
209 So. 3d 123
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/27/16), (quoting George v. Guillory, 00-591, p. 13 (La.App.