State ex rel. Jarrow v. State
State ex rel. Jarrow v. State, 222 So. 3d 1256 (La. 2017).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189
- State Ex Rel. Melinie v. State 665 So. 2d 1172
- State v. Cotton 45 So. 3d 1030
Opinion text
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS PER CURIAM: h Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189 . In addition, relator’s sentencing claim is not cognizable on collateral review. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 ; see also State v. Cotton, 09-2397 (La. 10/15/10), 45 So.3d 1030 . Finally, the application is repetitive. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. Denied. Relator has previously exhausted his right to state collateral review. See State ex rel. Jarrow v. State, 15-02238 (La. 8/4/17), — So.3d -.