No. 2017-CC-0115 Precedential Processed

Johnson v. Byrd

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed February 24, 2017 · 210 So. 3d 800

Opinion text

Hughes, J., would grant the writ and assigns reasons. |,I respectfully dissent and would grant the writ. The defendant did not solicit or conduct business in Louisiana. He did not advertise in Louisiana; his business was known by “word of mouth.” He did not seek the business, it came to him. His posture was passive, not active. Furthermore, the action involved, a dog bite, has nothing to do with his engine repair business. Had the dog bitten a neighbor, the mailman, or a salesman the result should be the same. Jurisdiction does not constitutionally lie in Louisiana under these facts.