No. 2018–C–0239 Precedential Processed

U.L. Coleman Co. v. Gosslee

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed April 16, 2018 · 240 So. 3d 180

Cited by

Bucks v. DirecTECH Southwest 266 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Knight v. Tucker 263 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019

Opinion text

*181 I would grant this writ, for the well-articulated reasons assigned by Judge Brown and Judge Bleich in their dissents in the court of appeal. Specifically, it is clear that U.L. Coleman and Keitha Dickson Gosslee had a complex and evolving-or devolving-professional relationship. The trial judge adroitly evaluated and analyzed the evidence, making credibility determinations of the principals of this matter, Coleman and Gosslee, and made detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. In my view, there was abundant evidence to support the trial judge's conclusion in light of the testimony. I would therefore grant this writ and reinstate the trial court's judgment.