No. 2019-C-0225
Precedential
Processed
Smith v. State
Smith v. State, 267 So. 3d 68 (La. 2019).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259
Opinion text
In this trip and fall case I would grant and docket the writ application of State of Louisiana/Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) to examine whether the plaintiff has presented sufficient factual support to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact: whether DOTD "had actual or constructive knowledge of the alleged (rug) defect and failed to take corrective measures within a reasonable time". See La. C.C.P. art. 966(D). See also Fontenot v. Patterson Ins. , 2009-0669 (La. 10/20/09), 23 So.3d 259 , 268.