Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Saunders v. Busch-Everett Co., 71 So. 153.

34 citing documents.

Gerhardt v. Coen 271 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Langlois v. Southern Timber, Inc. of Woodville 256 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Morgan City Co. v. Guarisco 116 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Rex-Metallic Casket Co. v. Gregory 104 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Kendrick v. Garrene 91 So. 2d 603 La. 1956
York v. Harper 91 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Thus in Saunders v. Busch-Everett Company, 1916, , 71 So.
Roussel v. Marshall 86 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Walker v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 71 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Scott v. Scott 48 So. 2d 899 La. 1950
Pennington v. Drews 24 So. 2d 156 La. 1945
State v. Duhe 9 So. 2d 517 La. 1942
See Cali v. National Linen Service Corp., 5 Cir., 38 F.2d 35 ; , 71 So.
Cooper v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans 197 So. 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
State Ex Rel. Mancuso v. Jefferson Parish School Board 197 So. 509 La. 1940
The pertinent part of Article 567 of the Code of Practice, invoked by the appellee, reads: “If such judgment have been confessed by him, or if he have acquiesced in the,same, by executing it voluntarily.” , 71 So.
Stringfellow v. Murphy 195 So. 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Parker v. Harvey 164 So. 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
“For an acquiescence in a judgment to take away the right of appeal, there must be an unconditional, voluntary, and absolute acquiescence by appellant, and he must have intended to acquiesce and abandon *510 his right of appeal.” , 71 So.
Gibson v. Young 163 So. 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Sam George Fur Co. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipeline Co. 148 So. 51 La. 1933
Thigpen v. Wall Printing Corporation 145 So. 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
McCoy v. State Line Oil & Gas Co. 143 So. 58 La. 1932
Dorcheat Gravel Co. v. Herold 138 So. 428 La. 1931
Latreille Estate, Inc. v. Thibeaux 126 So. 59 La. 1930
Hortman-Salmen Co. v. Naquin 124 So. 546 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1929
It is not pretended that any part of the judgment has been paid by appellant., “It is essential to an acquiescence in a judgment that will take away the right of appeal, that there must be an unconditional, voluntary, and absolute acquiescence by appellant, and he must have intended to acquiesce and abandon his right of appeal.” Saunders vs. Busch-Everett Co., , 71 So.
Blanchard v. Haber 118 So. 117 La. 1928
615 , referring to an obligation to pay a stipulated price per thousand feet of timber, which the obligor had the right either to cut and remove or not to cut and remove, within a given time; , 71 So.
Liles v. Texas Co. 117 So. 229 La. 1928
Gentilly Development Co. v. Carbajal 118 So. 78 La. 1928
Broussard v. Succession of Broussard 114 So. 834 La. 1927
1054 , , the court said: “Moreover,“nothing is more fundamental in the law of estoppel than that strangers to a deed cannot avail themselves of an estoppel arising from it.” It is shown that the plaintiff, Broussard, before the error in the description was discovered, had borrowed money from the bank and had drilled a w
Praegner v. Kinnebrew & Ratcliff 100 So. 247 La. 1924
Fomby v. Columbia County Development Co. 99 So. 537 La. 1924
Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's Heirs 91 So. 207 La. 1922
Kennon v. Brooks-Scanlon Co. 86 So. 675 La. 1920
Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Nabors Oil & Gas Co. 88 So. 723 La. 1920
this court (and the writer has a full share of responsibility therefor) in which the doctrine of the insusceptibility of the minerals in question to ownership, under the circumstances stated, has been accorded a passing, rather than a considered, recognition, as of a statement 'of a legal proposition not particularly affecting the matter before the court, though ( , 71 South.
Leonard v. Busch-Everett Co. 72 So. 749 La. 1916
Cochran v. Gulf Refining Co. 72 So. 718 La. 1916
Bristo v. Christine Oil & Gas Co. 71 So. 521 La. 1916
153 , , where we held that the stipulation allowing the grantee to keep the option in force by paying an annual rental of 15 cents an acre was valid, the right was limited to 5 years.