Sampite v. Deslouche
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 28, 1958 102 So. 2d 510
Sampite v. Deslouche, 65 So. 479 (La. 1914).
Cited by
- Parish of Jefferson v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 254 So. 2d 582 La. 1971
- Kleinpeter v. Ferrara 153 So. 689 La. 1934
- McIntyre v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World 131 So. 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Surety Credit Co. v. Tieman 131 So. 678 La. 1930
- Freibberg v. Benadey 8 La. App. 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
- O'Reilly Eng. Co. v. Buckner 5 La. App. 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
- Brown v. Hart 4 La. App. 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
- Bourgh v. Hester 1 La. App. 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Richardson v. Cobb 130 La. 203
Opinion text
LAND, J. Defendants and appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the following grounds: That the appeal was made returnable on January 19, 1914, and the appellants, on January 19, 1914, obtained an order for an extension of ten days, that is, until January SO, 1914, and that the transcript was not filed *332 until January 31, 1914. The order reads as follows: “It is ordered by the court that the return day for filing said transcript in this court be extended to the 30th day of January, 1914.” The transcript was filed in this court on January 31, 1914. There can be no question that the additional time granted for the filing of the transcript expired on January 30, 1914. And it is a well-settled rule of practice in civil cases that where the delay for the return of an appeal has been extended, and the transcript has not been filed in the Supreme Court on or before the return day, the appeal will be dismissed. Richardson v. Cobb, 130 La. 203 , 57 South. 889 . Appeal dismissed.