Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., 71 So. 598.

60 citing documents.

In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Tracy Ray Lomont v. Michelle Myer-Bennett and Xyz Insurance Company 172 So. 3d 620 La. 2015
1979); Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., -18, 71 So.
State of Louisiana v. Murphy Cormier General Contractors,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In the early twentieth century the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the foundational principles of equitable estoppel in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., So.
State v. Murphy Cormier General Contractors, Inc. 170 So. 3d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In the early twentieth century the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the foundational principles of equitable estoppel in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Hercules Offshore, Inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board, Sales and Use Tax Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Hercules cites Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., So.
Hercules Offshore, Inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board, Sales & Use Tax Dept. 157 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hercules cites Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fred's, Inc. 18 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
at 219 , citing Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Smith v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL AND TREATMENT COUNCIL, INC. 806 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
With equal profundity and eloquence Chief Justice Monroe of the Louisiana Supreme Court in 1916 stated: "No law was ever enacted which contemplated the defeat of its purpose by fraud, and no court was ever organized which would knowingly permit a litigant to profit by his own wrong," concurring in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Evans v. Canadianoxy Offshore Production Co. 730 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
ent the success of justice, right and truth.’ [[Image here]] With equal profundity and eloquence Chief Justice Monroe of the Louisiana Supreme Court in 1916 stated: “No law was ever enacted which contemplated the defeat of its purpose by fraud, and no court was ever organized which would knowingly permit a litigant to profit by his own wrong,” concurring in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering 707 So. 2d 23 La. 1998
597 , (1970); Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Claim of Aron 695 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
(d); see also Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
National Council on Compensation Ins. v. QUIXX TEMPORARY SERVICES INC. 665 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(d); see also Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Wimberly v. Gatch 635 So. 2d 206 La. 1994
In explanation of its decision to apply the third category of the doctrine of contra non valentem to Corsey's situation, this court quoted Justice Provosty in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., *217 , 71 So.
Rajnowski v. St. Patrick's Hosp. 564 So. 2d 671 La. 1990
As Justice Provosty observed in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust, , 71 So.
Doe v. Ainsworth 540 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In reversing the trial court, the Supreme Court stated: As Justice Provosty stated for this court in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust, , 71 So.
Bock v. Harmon 526 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
As Justice Provosty stated for this court in the Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust, , 71 So.
Richards v. LaCour 515 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, , 71 So.
Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co. 502 So. 2d 1034 La. 1987
The Court majority in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
In re Filiation of Jones 463 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
597 , (1970)]; Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
General American Oil Co. of Texas v. Meche 442 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, , 71 So.
Distinguished Harvey v. Davis 432 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
West v. Gajdzik 425 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Cartwright v. Chrysler Corporation, supra; Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 375 So. 2d 1319 La. 1979
Co., Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Nathan v. Carter 372 So. 2d 560 La. 1979
598 , (1970); Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
McClendon v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 357 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
The most often cited case recognizing the existence of this doctrine in Louisiana is Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Favors v. Southern Industries, Inc. 344 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Arceneaux v. Motor Vehicle Cas. Co. 341 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
3rd Cir. 1974), writ denied Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, , 71 So.
Jackson v. Zito 314 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Steel v. Aetna Life & Casualty 304 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
The doctrine is thoroughly reviewed in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, , 71 So.
Majesty v. Comet-Mercury-Ford Co. of Lorain, Mich. 296 So. 2d 271 La. 1974
Cyr v. Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corporation 273 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Justice Provosty, as organ of the court, said, in speaking of the case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Bauman v. Bauman 260 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Perrodin v. Clement 254 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
"In the case of Hyman vs. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Lassere v. Lassere 255 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Cartwright v. Chrysler Corp. 232 So. 2d 285 La. 1970
413 ; Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Cartwright v. Chrysler Corporation 232 So. 2d 285 La. 1970
413 ; Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Prather v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. 232 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
The leading authority on this subject is the case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Dagenhart v. Robertson Truck Lines, Inc. 230 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
The case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, , 71 So.
Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation 199 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company et al. , 71 So.
Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
In the case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Dufrene v. Tracy 94 So. 2d 297 La. 1957
The case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Ayres v. New York Life Ins. Co. 54 So. 2d 409 La. 1951
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Pope v. Employers Liability Assur. Corporation 14 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1943
Smith v. Tyson 192 So. 61 La. 1939
to the facts, as we take it, that plaintiffs were not aware of their rights under the laws of Louisiana, which are different, as relates to inheritance, from those of the state in which the estate was domiciled, and in which plaintiffs reside.” A review of the jurisprudence on the maxim, “contra non valentem, agere non currit prescriptio,” appears in Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. et al., , 71 So.
Kennard v. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. 190 So. 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Thus in the case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, , 71 So.
Cruze v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia 185 So. 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
It is true that, in the matters of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Cruze v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia 184 So. 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
The leading authority on this subject is the case of Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.
Fertitta Bros. v. Vanchiere 178 So. 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
14 , Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. et al., , 71 So.
Brown Shoe Co. v. Unter 173 So. 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
See Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co., , 71 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by