Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watts v. Collier, 72 So. 822.
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Shipp 205 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
- Jenkins v. Lee 166 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Succession of Vegas
145 So. 2d 613
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
47:2 and the jurisprudence as established in Watts, et al., v. Collier, Sheriff et al., , 72 So.
- Commerce Loan Co. v. Howard 82 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Mirandona Bros. v. Danos 56 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
- Falgout v. Johnson 186 So. 349 La. 1939
- Jackson v. Spearman 177 So. 658 La. 1937
-
Barron v. Jackson Parish Bank
168 So. 90
La. 1936
847 ; Watts et al. v. Collier, Sheriff, , 72 So.
- Hemenway, Inc. v. Guillory 155 So. 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
-
Succession of Gauthreaux
139 So. 322
La. 1932
In Watts et al. v. Collier, Sheriff, , 72 So.
-
Leon v. Campagna
127 So. 358
La. 1930
107 , , the court in concluding its opinion said: “Our conclusion is that the uncorroborated testimony of only one witness cannot prevail over the denial on oath of the- alleged obligor, to prove that he or she signed the disputed obligation by making a cross mark or by holding or touching the pen with which his or her
-
Lemieux v. Morales
119 So. 450
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
101 , ; Bernheim vs. Pesson, 143 La.
-
Easterwood v. Scott
1 La. App. 547
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
“But the proof by witnesses shall not exclude the proof by experts or by comparison of the writings as established by the Civil Code.” Defendant’s counsel cites Watts vs. Collier, , 72 South.