No. 20553
Precedential
Remanded.
Processed
Pons v. Pons
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 15, 1955 81 So. 2d 73
Pons v. Pons, 68 So. 201 (La. 1914).
Cited by
- Interdiction of F.T.E. 594 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- In re the Interdiction of Fabre 361 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- In Re Adams 209 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
- Putnam v. Pons 103 So. 254 La. 1925
- Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus v. Veazey 92 So. 338 La. 1922
- Succession of Pons 77 So. 515 La. 1918
- Ruiz v. Pons 74 So. 713 La. 1916
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal. PROVOSTY, J. Nothing showing that the American Surety Company of New York, surety on the appeal bond, had qualified, under Act 41, p. 45, of 1894, and Act 71, p. 185, of 1904, to do business in this state, motion was made to dismiss the appeal for want of a proper bond; but on certiorari the proper proof of such qualification has now been furnished, and hence, the said motion to dismiss must be overruled. The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.