Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wise v. Lavigne, 70 So. 103.
- Barnes v. Pick 311 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
- Turner v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 175 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
- Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 165 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
- Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
- Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 124 So. 2d 913 La. 1960
- Crawford v. Magnolia 4 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
- Tesoro v. Abate 173 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
-
Byrd v. Spiro
170 So. 384
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
768, 769 , the Supreme Court said: “There is nothing in the facts of the case to distinguish it from *385 , 70 So.
- Willis v. Cahn 164 So. 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
-
Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co.
157 So. 395
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
The many cases to which we have referred and a , 70 So.
- Chutz v. Bergeron 147 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Herbert v. Herrlitz 146 So. 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Ayo v. Holzenthal 141 So. 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Viola v. Convery
122 So. 90
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Wise vs. Lavigne, , 70 So.
- Klein v. Young 111 So. 495 La. 1926
-
Gallman v. Young
3 La. App. 756
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Wise vs. Lavigne, , 70 South.
-
Pierre v. Levy
3 La. App. 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
But defendant says she was a trespasser and without recourse, citing Wise vs. Lavigne, , 70 South.
- Breen v. Walters 91 So. 50 La. 1922
- Plescia v. Le Roy 86 So. 824 La. 1921
- Badie v. Columbia Brewing Co. 77 So. 768 La. 1918
- Allain v. Frigola 74 So. 404 La. 1917
-
Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co.
72 So. 513
La. 1916
It has since been expressly affirmed in Cristadoro v. Von Behren’s Heirs, supra, , 70 South.