Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co., 72 So. 513.

42 citing documents.

Buxton v. Allstate Ins. Co. 434 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Barnes v. Pick 311 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Anderson v. Sciambra 310 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Wilson v. Virgademo 258 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Reed v. Classified Parking System 232 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
Turner v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 175 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 165 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 124 So. 2d 913 La. 1960
Murray v. Patton 118 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Anderson v. Simmons 75 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Mobry v. Frazier 4 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Hughes v. Abate 2 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Johnson v. Lucy Realty & Development Co. 187 So. 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
It is true that, , 72 So.
King v. Bankers Indemnity Ins. Co. 180 So. 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Danove v. Mahoney 176 So. 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
The identical question presented in this case was decided adversely to defendants’ , 72 So.
Tesoro v. Abate 173 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Washington v. Rosen 165 So. 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Thomas v. Catalanatto 164 So. 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 157 So. 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Hanover v. Brady 148 So. 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
May v. Schepis 147 So. 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
950 , , and it is shown that most of them are not in point with the case at bar, and in that case the following rule was laid down,' which has been followed ever since, i. e.: The right accorded a lessee by article 2694, Revised Civil Code, does not impose up *719 on lessee any obligation to make the repairs wbicb prim
Chutz v. Bergeron 147 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
954 , ; Wise v. Lavigne, 138 La.
Labat v. Gaerthner Realty Co., Inc. 146 So. 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Caulfield v. Saba 144 So. 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Monkhouse v. Johns 142 So. 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Thompson v. Moran 140 So. 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Davis v. Cohen 137 So. 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Creevy v. D. H. Holmes Co. 134 So. 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Divas v. Noto 134 So. 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Stumpf v. Baronne Building, Inc. 135 So. 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Richard v. Tarantino 131 So. 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
The legal principle involved in such a , 72 So.
Thomas v. Shreveport Railways Co. 13 La. App. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
455 ; Boutte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 So.
Gardiner v. De Salles 126 So. 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
The case is squarely covered by Boutte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 So.
McIlhenny v. Roxana Petroleum Corp. 122 So. 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1929
797 ; Boutte vs. New Orleans Terminal Co., , 72 So.
Viola v. Convery 122 So. 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
The facts in this case are analogous to those in Boutte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 So.
Liddell v. Lex 8 La. App. 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Butte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 So.
Klein v. Young 111 So. 495 La. 1926
946 , .; Wise v. Lavigne, 138 La.
Jameson v. Standard Oil Co. 2 La. App. 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
ot sufficient to overcome the well recognized principle of law that the findings of fact of the trial .judge who saw the witnesses and heard them testify and observed their manner of testifying will not be reversed unless manifestly erroneous; nor to overcome the well settled jurisprudence that he who alleges contributory negligence carried the burden of proving it— Boutte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 South.
Morgan v. Cusimano 2 La. App. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Boutte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 South.
Armour Packing Co. v. Walker Price Oil Co. 1 La. App. 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
51 , in support of the proposition that: “When the action- of both parties must have concurred to produce the injury, it develops upon the plaintiff to show that he was not himself guilty of negligence.” But in Boutte vs. N. O. Terminal Co., , 72 South.
Landry v. Monteleone 90 So. 919 La. 1922
Ciaccio v. Carbajal 83 So. 73 La. 1919
The past jurisprudence of this court having left some room for doubt as to the effect to be given to the language of article 2693, 'authorizing the lessee to make repairs which the lessor should, hut fails to, make, that question was made the subject of a review in the case of%5 , 72 South.