Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., 79 So. 768.

42 citing documents.

  • Marks v. Zimmerman Farms, LLC 13 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • In Re Succession of Moore 737 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    See art. 3502, official comment (c); Harang v. Golden Ranch [Land] & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Fleniken v. Allbritton 566 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    See art. 3502, official revision comment (c); Harang v. Golden Ranch & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Brown v. Wood 451 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    See also, Stutson v. McGee, supra; Emmer v. Rector, supra; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Succession of Campbell 243 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    683 (1938); Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Trahan v. Broussard 206 So. 2d 82 La. 1968
    34 , ; and Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery Company 158 So. 2d 179 La. 1963
    App., ; Sattler v. Pellichino, La.App., ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Noel v. Jumonville Pipe & Machinery Co. 148 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    “The described holding in the Sibley case has been cited approvingly in subsequent decisions of this court, including Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Company, , 79 So.
  • Stutson v. McGee 130 So. 2d 403 La. 1961
    The described holding in the Sibley case has been cited approvingly in subsequent decisions of this court, including Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Company, , 79 So.
  • Stutson v. McGee 125 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    In determining tacking of possession of the vendor for the purposes of thirty year prescription, the Supreme Court in the case of Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Hadwin v. Sledge 116 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    502 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Isacks v. Deutsch 114 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    * * * * * * "The court, in its opinion on rehearing [Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Hebert v. Chargois 106 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    760 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , *20 1009, 79 So.
  • Succession of Lapene 96 So. 2d 321 La. 1957
    See, Lee v. Jones, supra; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Roberson v. Green 91 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    502 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Richey v. Hill 84 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    502 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., 1918, , 79 So.
  • Finley v. Morgan 80 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    413 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Jowers v. Coats 76 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    502 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co. [ , 79 So.
  • Sattler v. Pellichino 71 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    11 , referred to the case of Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Thurmon v. Hogg 72 So. 2d 500 La. 1954
    [304] “ ‘The Court pointed out that in the Harang case [Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Coats v. Lee 70 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    502 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Company, [ , 79 So.
  • Lee v. Jones 69 So. 2d 26 La. 1953
    869 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Tarver 52 So. 2d 437 La. 1951
    This is shown by the opinion he authored on rehearing in Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Beam v. Dudding 43 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Merritt v. Smith 35 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    502 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land Drainage Company, supra [ , 79 So.
  • Ford v. Ford 34 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Labarre v. Rateau 26 So. 2d 279 La. 1946
    413 ; Harang, et al. v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Company, , 79 So.
  • Buckley v. Catlett 13 So. 2d 384 La. 1943
    413 ; Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Company, , 79 So.
  • Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
    2, p. 91, particularly comment No. 22; and what was said on the subject in Harang v. .Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co. [ , 79 So.
  • Succession of Tyson 172 So. 772 La. 1937
    See, also, Harang et al. v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Emmer v. Rector 143 So. 11 La. 1932
  • Thibodeaux v. Bonnabel Land Company 131 So. 833 La. 1930
    Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Ducre v. Milner 126 So. 72 La. 1930
    Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Ducre v. Milner 120 So. 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    Harang vs. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • Broussard v. Broussard 8 La. App. 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    183 ; Harang vs. Golden Ranch Land and Drainage Co., , 79 So.
  • McCahill v. Wood 4 La. App. 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    502 ; Harang vs. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 South.
  • Gahn v. Brown 107 So. 576 La. 1925
  • Opdenwyer v. Brown 99 So. 482 La. 1924
  • Harang v. Gheens Realty Co. 98 So. 760 La. 1923
    Some of the chief questions to be determined in this case were before us in the cases of Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 South.
  • Roussel v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. 93 So. 758 La. 1922
    Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 South.
  • Bendernagel v. Foret 81 So. 869 La. 1919
    Plaintiffs’ title is the same that was recognized in favor of two of them for an adjacent tract of land, in the suit of Dominique Harang et al. v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 South.
  • Harang v. Bowie Lumber Co. 81 So. 769 La. 1919
    The title relied upon by the plaintiffs is the same that was recognized in favor of two of them as plaintiffs in the suit of Dominique Harang et al. v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co., , 79 South.