Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stevens v. Allen, 71 So. 936.
- Swope v. Mitchell 324 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Berry v. Berry 300 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Douglas v. Douglas 146 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
- Succession of Kieran 144 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- Bush v. Bush 95 So. 2d 298 La. 1957
- Juneau v. Juneau 80 So. 2d 864 La. 1955
- DuVernay v. Ledbetter 61 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
- Spring v. Spring 27 So. 2d 358 La. 1946
-
Burgan v. Burgan
22 So. 2d 649
La. 1945
However, when the plaintiff' sought to confirm this default, the trial judge dismissed the plaintiff’s , 71 So.
-
Bruno v. Mauro
17 So. 2d 253
La. 1944
' Unless a husband abandon his wife or by reason of his misconduct force her to acquire a separate domicile, “a married woman has no other domicile, and can acquire no other, than that of her husband, and is bound to follow and live with him wherever he may choose to reside.” , 71 So.
- Zinko v. Zinko 15 So. 2d 859 La. 1943
- Zinko v. Zinko 15 So. 2d 859 La. 1943
- McGee v. Gasery 171 So. 49 La. 1936
-
Voorhies v. Voorhies
166 So. 121
La. 1936
135 ; , on rehearing 674, 71 So.
- Aarnes v. Aarnes 135 So. 13 La. 1931
-
Howell v. Kretz
131 So. 204
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
662 , , L. R. A. 1916E, 1115.
-
Mann v. Mann
129 So. 543
La. 1930
662 , , L. R. A. 1916E, 1115, held that, with certain stated exceptions, a married woman has no other domicile and can acquire no other, than that of her husband, and is bound to follow and live with him, wherever he may choose to reside.
-
Evans v. Evans
116 So. 831
La. 1928
356 , 19 L. R. A. 814; , 71 So.
- Mathews v. Mathews 103 So. 267 La. 1925
- Laiche v. His Wife 100 So. 292 La. 1924
- Lepenser v. Griffin 83 So. 839 La. 1919
- Clark v. Clark 82 So. 875 La. 1919