Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Franek v. Brewster, 76 So. 187.

20 citing documents.

Commercial Securities Co., Inc. v. Ross 318 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
618 (1872); , (1917); The Rights of a Defendant in Executory Process, 17 Tulane Law Review 630 (1943).
Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company 158 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Doherty v. Randazzo 128 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Hightower v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. of Shreveport 117 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Next counsel proceeds to argue the asserted analogy between the right of a surviving spouse to recover for loss of support under Article 2315, and the right of a surviving widow in necessitous circumstances to recover under Article 3252 of the LSA-Civil Code, citing Jones v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, La.App., ; , 76 So.
Mack Motor Truck Corp. v. Coco 106 So. 2d 518 La. 1958
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo 64 So. 2d 417 La. 1953
Nolen v. Davidson's Succession 190 So. 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
The exhibition of the note and mortgage by the plaintiff, identified him as the holder who, by the terms of the contract, was entitled to the order of seizure and sale.” , 76 So.
Martin-Wilkie Chevrolet Co. v. Wingart 189 So. 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Texarkana Casket Co. v. Brooks 183 So. 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Coreil v. Vidrine 177 So. 233 La. 1937
Burden v. Peoples' Homestead & Savings Ass'n 167 So. 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Miller v. People's Homestead & Savings Ass'n 161 So. 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
And the only remedy for arresting executory proceedings, on grounds not disclosed by the proceedings, is by injunction.” , 76 So.
State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Cage 151 So. 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Bank of Coushatta v. Burch 148 So. 680 La. 1933
Johnson v. Bolt 146 So. 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Ann. 832 , it was held that, where the widow dies without making claim to the “homestead privilege,” the right lapsed and her heirs could not successfully make claim for the amount; that the privilege was not heritable; , 76 So.
Weber v. Dawson 133 So. 751 La. 1931
Citizens Discount & Investment Co. v. Brennan 5 La. App. 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
269 ; Franek vs. Brewster, , 76 So.
Gottlieb v. Schloss 5 La. App. 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
See Franek vs. Brewster, , 76 South.
Thompson v. Crow 3 La. App. 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In the case of Franec vs. Brewster, , 76 South.
Alfano v. Franek 105 So. 598 La. 1925

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by