Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Albert v. Munch, 75 So. 513.
- Tate v. Hill 197 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Cormier v. Sinegal 180 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
- Kimball v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 161 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Salley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 157 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
-
Rainwater v. Boatright
61 So. 2d 212
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
2 Blashfield's Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice (Permanent Edition) p. 540, § 1501 and § 1502, p. 544; , 75 So.
- Foster v. Herrin Motor Lines, Inc. 189 So. 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
McMorris Ex Rel. McMorris v. Graham
176 So. 630
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
2 Blash-field’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice (Permanent Edition) p. 540, § 1501 and § 1502, p. 544; , 75 So.
- Llorens v. McCann 175 So. 442 La. 1937
- Cimo v. Karstendiek 173 So. 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Guillory v. Horecky 168 So. 481 La. 1936
- Kahn v. Shreveport Railways Co. 161 So. 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Moreau v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 158 So. 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
-
Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Landry
153 So. 61
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
This he did not do, and, as a consequence, his father, the owner of the automobile, is liable.” , 75 So.
-
Guillory v. United Gas Public Service Co.
148 So. 274
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
1025 , 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 677; , 75 So.
-
Brown v. Wade
145 So. 790
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
“All of the actions of the child, as seen by the defendant, clearly indicated its purpose to cross the street, and he had no right to assume that, because it paused a moment at the curbing, it had abandoned that purpose.” An early case, after the motor vehicle became somewhat generally in use, , 75 So.
- Bosarge v. Spiess Co. 145 So. 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
-
Ziegler v. Lamantia
126 So. 262
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
App. 353 ; Albert vs. Munch, , 75 So.
-
Jacoby v. Gallaher
126 So. 86
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
209 ; Albert vs. Munch, So.
-
Jacoby v. Gallaher
120 So. 888
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Jn Albert vs. Munch, , 75 So.
- Hebert v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 91 So. 406 La. 1922
- Edmendorf v. Clark 79 So. 557 La. 1917