State v. Boylston
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 7, 1960 118 So. 2d 510
State v. Boylston, 70 So. 80 (La. 1915).
Cited by
- Lavergne v. Indemnity Insurance Co. 84 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Beene v. Pardue 79 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
- Collins v. Sun Oil Co. 68 So. 2d 184 La. 1953
- Meyer v. Comegys 86 So. 307 La. 1920
- Russell v. Producers' Oil Co. 83 So. 773 La. 1920
Opinion text
MONROE, C. J. The questions presented in this case are identical with those which have been fully considex’ed by the court in the opinion this day handed down in the case of State v. Boylston, 69 South. 860 , ante, p. 21, No. 21161 of the docket. Por the reasons assigned in that opinion, therefore, it is ordered and adjudged that the motion to dismiss the appeal hex’ein be denied; that the ruling of the trial judge, holding paragraph 7 of Act 189 of 1902 to be unconstitutional, be -affirmed; that said ruling, in so far as it quashes the indictment herein found against defendant, be x-evex-sed; and that this case be remanded for a 'rehearing upon the motion to quash, first filed- by defendant, and for further proceedings according to law.