DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hyman Hiller & Co. v. New Orleans, M. & C. R., 81 So. 883.

21 citing documents.

  • Deshotels v. Statewide Trailer Sales 333 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Vercher v. Toda Enterprises, Inc. 216 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • General Insurance Co. of America v. Watts 129 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    We feel that a close reading of the following language *514 in the Smith case refutes the defendant’s interpretation: “The law of this state with reference to person’s , 81 So.
  • Disimone v. Bryant 120 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    They maintain, however, that interest should be allowed to run from the date of the conversion, and, in support of this contention, , 81 So.
  • Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman 92 So. 2d 574 La. 1957
    led in this court, we must determine what right plaintiff seeks to assert and, hence, the nature of plaintiff’s action ; and for the determination we must examine the allegations and prayer of the petition for “it is the well settled jurisprudence of this state that the character which plaintiff gives his pleadings and the form of his action govern the prescription applicable.” , 81 So.
  • Morello v. Viola 66 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • Hyde v. Sims 61 So. 2d 881 La. 1952
    * * * The objection to the alleged de- lay in filing the transcript under the first order of appeal is therefore without merit.” , 81 So.
  • A.B.C. Oil Burner Heating Co. v. Palmer 28 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    Ann. 347 ; , 161, 81 So.
  • Smith v. Dover 185 So. 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    The law of this state with reference to a person’s civil remedy when his property, , 81 So.
  • Brown Shoe Co. v. Unter 173 So. 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Bryson v. Bates-Crumley Chevrolet Co. 171 So. 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
  • Bryson v. Bates-Crumley Chevrolet Co. 166 So. 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • Antoine v. Franichevich 167 So. 98 La. 1936
  • Antoine v. Franichevich 167 So. 98 La. 1936
  • Wilkinson v. City of Shreveport 165 So. 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
  • Antoine v. Franichevich 161 So. 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
  • Craddock v. Jones 143 So. 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
  • Hodges v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. 141 So. 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
  • Louisiana Title & Mortgage Co. v. Daigre 7 La. App. 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    In a mbre recent case, that of Reynolds vs. Reiss, , the court held, to quote the syllabus by the court: “One whose property is unlawfully taken without asserting any claim to its return may demand as damages the value of his property, together with interest thereon from the date of the alleged conversion.” And held that such claim is barred by the prescription of one
  • Hitt v. Herndon 117 So. 568 La. 1927
  • Holthaus v. Lane Cotton Mills Co. 3 La. App. 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    We must be governed by the jurisprudence established in the Jones case, which has not been qualified by subsequent decisions of the ,Supreme Court, not even by that of Reynolds vs. Reiss, , 81 South.