Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spence v. Lucas, 70 So. 796.

32 citing documents.

Page v. City of Winnfield 925 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Arts.2015, 2733; , 70 So.
Peyton Place, Condominium Ass'n v. Guastella 668 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
PEYTON PLACE, CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Guastella 668 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Toomer v. Lowenthal 430 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company 329 So. 2d 744 La. 1976
Coleman v. Tettleton 287 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Ree Corporation v. Shaffer 246 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Evangeline Refining Co. v. Nunez 153 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Articles 2681 and 2682; , 70 So.
McDonald v. O'Meara 139 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Davis v. Laster 130 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
For example, a lease affecting the whole property where the lessor was the owner of but an undivided interest was held valid under Article 2682, , 70 So.
Grave v. Scott 107 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Sun Oil Company v. State Mineral Board 92 So. 2d 583 La. 1956
Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
For example, a lease affecting the whole property where the lessor was the owner oif but an undivided interest was held valid under Article 2682, , 70 So.
Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
For example, a lease affecting the whole property where the lessor was the owner of but an undivided interest was held valid under Article 2682, , 70 So.
Texas Co. v. State Mineral Board 44 So. 2d 841 La. 1949
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Murphy 16 So. 2d 244 La. 1943
277 ), consequently, that a person securing a lease from only a portion *727 of such co-owners and heirs cannot be deprived of any right, because he secured such lease knowing that “the property might be judicially partitioned by licitation, and that the lease would fail if the property was sold to a third person.” , 70 So.
Young v. Staman 200 So. 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
The Supreme Court remarked in Spence, , 70 So.
Grimm v. Pugh 197 So. 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Tyson v. Surf Oil Co. 196 So. 336 La. 1940
e codal provisions applicable to ordinary leases would be applied thereto insofar as they may be; “Until ■ the Legislature shall have passed laws specially applicable to the industry of mining, which is a new one in this state, the parties engaged in those pursuits and the courts of the state will adhere to the jurisprudence on the subject, and treat mineral contracts as leases.” , 70 So.
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese 196 So. 558 La. 1940
938, did not intend to nor did it in fact overrule the settled jurisprudence of this state “that acts entered into by one of the coproprietors on an undivided object are subordinate to the result of a partition,” and that, when the property leased by one coproprietor without the consent of the others “ * * * is sold to effect the partition, the title will pass free of the lease.” , 70 So.
Lacaze v. Beeman 178 So. 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
436, 438 , said: *662 “The defendants in this case cannot deny their lessor’s title and refuse to pay rent under the lease.” In substantiation pf that statement, , 70 So.
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Barrett 179 So. 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. Glassell 171 So. 846 La. 1936
509 , L.R.A.1916D, 1147, Ann. Cas.1917D, 130; , 70 So.
Bickham v. Pitts 171 So. 80 La. 1936
Stinson v. Marston 169 So. 436 La. 1936
Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Calcasieu Real Estate & Oil Co. 170 So. 785 La. 1936
Mathews v. Priest 165 So. 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Article 2681 of the Revised Civil Code provides: ' “He who possesses a thing belonging to another, may Jet it to a third person, but he can not let it for any other use than that to which it is usually applied.” , 70 So.
Defelice v. Autin 159 So. 648 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1935
Roberson v. Pioneer Gas Co. 137 So. 46 La. 1931
Logan v. State Gravel Co. 103 So. 526 La. 1925
Gulf Refining Co. v. Carroll 82 So. 277 La. 1919
1917D, 130, supra, where an oil and mineral lease made by a part owner in indivisión was held not to invest the lessee with the right to sue for a partition, the question of the validity of the lease was not raised or brought in any way to the attention of the court, and, needless to say, , 70 South.
Gulf Refining Co. v. Hayne 70 So. 509 La. 1915