No. 21624
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
Scheen v. Hain
Scheen v. Hain, 75 So. 427 (La. 1915).
Cited by
- Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc. 94 So. 3d 750 La. 2012
- Cressionnie v. Intrepid, Inc. 879 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
- Gray v. Bird Son 12 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
- Stovall v. Thomas Lumber Co. 189 So. 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Tyler v. Phillips 139 So. 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Richard v. Horecky 128 So. 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Dupuis v. Reynaud 8 La. App. 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
- Jackson v. Parish of Vernon 91 So. 509 La. 1922
- Xeter Realty, Ltd. v. Dreyfous 5 Pelt. 368 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1922
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 27 La. Ann. 314 not in our corpus
- Webb v. Keller 39 La. Ann. 55
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal. SOMMERVILLE, J. [1] The motion to dismiss is on the ground that no motion or petition was filed by plaintiff, asking for an appeal. The record was filed September 4, 1915, and the motion to dismiss was filed September 30, 1915. The motion comes too late. C. P. art. 886; Walker v. Sauvinet, 27 La. Ann. 314 ; Webb v. Keller, 39 La. Ann. 55 , 1 South. 423 . The motion to dismiss is denied.