DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dunson v. Baker, 80 So. 238.

20 citing documents.

  • Vincent v. State Through Dept. of Corrections 468 So. 2d 1329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied, , 80 So.
  • Keys v. Sambo's Restaurant, Inc. 389 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Code of Criminal Procedure Article 214; and cases cited therein
  • Roche v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 303 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • State v. Jones 267 So. 2d 559 La. 1972
  • Post v. Rodrigue 205 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
  • State v. Pickens 160 So. 2d 577 La. 1964
  • State v. Aias 149 So. 2d 400 La. 1963
  • State v. Aias 149 So. 2d 400 La. 1963
  • Barfield v. Marron 62 So. 2d 276 La. 1952
  • McHugh v. Placid Oil Co. 19 So. 2d 221 La. 1944
    y the com *529 mission of offenses against the law, are of this quasi criminal nature, we think that they are within the reason of criminal proceedings for all the purposes of the fourth amendment of the constitution, and of that portion of the fifth amendment which declares that no person shall he compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself; * * , 80 So.
  • Martin v. Magee 161 So. 604 La. 1935
  • Moulin v. Monteleone 115 So. 447 La. 1927
  • Girlinghouse v. Zwahlen 3 La. App. 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    Golibert vs. Sullivan, 66 N. E. 88 ; also Dunson vs. Baker, , 80 South.
  • Martin v. Cappel 106 So. 660 La. 1925
    921 , 15 L. R. A. 63.” , 80 So.
  • Brown v. Dawkins 2 La. App. 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Dunson vs. Baker, , 80 South.
  • Claverie v. Lorenz 1 La. App. 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    541 ; Dunson vs. Baker, , 80 South.
  • Mundy v. Phillips 102 So. 519 La. 1924
  • Janssen Catering Co. v. Abadie 102 So. 428 La. 1924
  • Granberry v. Jarrau 7 Pelt. 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922
    civil action for the redress or a private wrong with a quasi,criminal prosecution e-for the assu*eBenefit of the public,but the solS* purpose and .principal objeot of which is to Increase the adequate indemnity *231 recovered toy une plaintiff as actual and compensatory damages toy tile addition of a pecuniary penalty in the form or exemplary primitivej.or vindictive damages Also Dunson vs Baker -428 -586-146 La 678-10 A 33.
  • State v. Delovisio 80 So. 666 La. 1918