Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bendernagel v. Foret, 81 So. 869.

24 citing documents.

Succession of Campbell 243 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Bendernagel v. Foret, 1919, , 81 So.
Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery Company 158 So. 2d 179 La. 1963
Boyet v. Perryman 123 So. 2d 79 La. 1960
Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. 105 So. 2d 392 La. 1958
Penfield v. Sowel 85 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Rodriguez v. Shroder 77 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners 77 So. 2d 32 La. 1954
Lee v. Jones 69 So. 2d 26 La. 1953
Sun Oil Co. v. Tarver 52 So. 2d 437 La. 1951
Hence, their claims are prescribed under the interpretation given to Article 1030 , 81 So.
Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Applegate 50 So. 2d 197 La. 1950
Dileo v. Dileo 46 So. 2d 53 La. 1950
Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co. 35 So. 2d 225 La. 1947
Dugas v. Powell 21 So. 2d 366 La. 1945
Their argument is that the ex parte judgment sending defendants into possession was an acceptance of the succession by the parties to it, and that this acceptance cut off the right of any other heirs to accept after the 30-year period had lapsed, , 81 So.
Pierce v. Hunter 13 So. 2d 259 La. 1943
Thus, , at page 119, 81 So.
Dugas v. Powell 1 So. 2d 677 La. 1941
Their argument is that the ex parte judgment sending defendants into possession was an acceptance of the succession by the parties to it, and that this acceptance cut off the right of any other heirs to accept after the 30-year period had lapsed, , 81 So.
Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
Hunter v. Forrest 197 So. 649 La. 1940
Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
Bruce v. Holstein 151 So. 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1934
249 , quoting from the syllabus, the court said: “A deed describing a different tract of land from the one in controversy is not translative of the land in controversy, and cannot serve as a basis for prescription.” , 81 So.
Ducre v. Milner 126 So. 72 La. 1930
Ducre v. Milner 120 So. 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
768 ; Bendernagel vs. Foret, , 81 So.
Sliman v. Joseph 118 So. 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
411 ; Bendernable vs. Foret, , 81 So.
Bayard v. Baldwin Lumber Co. 103 So. 290 La. 1925
Harang v. Gheens Realty Co. 98 So. 760 La. 1923