Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Joliff v. City of Shreveport, 80 So. 200.
- Hamilton v. City of Shreveport 168 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Musmeci v. American Automobile Insurance Company 146 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
- Franks v. City of Alexandria 128 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
-
Brown v. City of Shreveport
129 So. 2d 540
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
243 ; Joliff v. City of Shreveport, 1918, , 80 So.
- Barnett v. City of Monroe 124 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
- Norred v. City of Shreveport 90 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Barber Laboratories, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 78 So. 2d 525 La. 1955
- Prunty v. City of Shreveport 66 So. 2d 3 La. 1953
- Taulli v. Gregory 65 So. 2d 312 La. 1953
-
Manguno v. City of New Orleans
155 So. 41
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Joliff v. City of Shreveport, et al., , 80 So.
-
Trumata v. Board of Levee Commissioners
3 La. App. 785
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
If so, it follows that the city is not liable for the acts of their officers, even though illegal or of such a character as to subject the officers themselves to liability-” Affirmed in Joliff vs. City, , 80 South.
-
Howard v. City of New Orleans
105 So. 443
La. 1925
As to the second, the rules which govern the responsibility of individuals are properly applicable.” See, also, , 80 So.
-
Howard v. City of New Orleans
1 La. App. 780
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Their duties are the preservation of public order and tranquility, and the City, in appointing them, exercised a 'governmental function, conferred upon it, in its public or municipal character, for public purposes, exclusively, and is not therefore liable for the acts of its officers.” Affirmed in Joliff vs. City, , 80 South.