Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Soniat v. Whitmer, 74 So. 916.

49 citing documents.

Chalyn Perez v. Dann Cahoon and Kristen Cahoon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
“The silence of the judgment on any demand which was an issue in the case under the pleadings must be considered as an absolute rejection of the demand.” 74 So.
Gay Lowery v. Jena Nursing & Rehab Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Lowery v. Jena Nursing & Rehab Center 156 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ken Lawler Builders, Inc. v. Delaney 840 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 801 So. 2d 331 La. 2001
O & M CONST. v. State, Div. of Admin. 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
O & M Construction, Inc. v. State, Division of Administration 576 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Potvin v. Wright's Sound Gallery, Inc. 568 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Sun Finance Co., Inc. v. Jackson 525 So. 2d 532 La. 1988
903, 904 (1933); , 74 So.
Cannon v. Pennzoil Co. 520 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Gremillion v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 430 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Overruled Poole v. American Bank & Trust Co. 416 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Phillips v. Great Southern Mortg. & Loan Corp. 350 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Cagle v. Spade Drilling Co., Inc. 325 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Bamburg v. Nelson 313 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Gauthreaux v. Gauthreaux 315 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
[3] Smith v. Atkins, supra; , 74 So.
Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 308 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Rills v. Southern Bell Telephone Co. 305 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Ruiz v. Succession of Viosca 291 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
art. 3751, enables the claimant to protect himself against third parties; and the statute must be complied with to preserve such interest in respect to the property, Soniat v. Whitmer, 1916, , 74 So.
Garvin v. City of New Orleans 270 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
398, 400 (1884), , 74 So.
Lloyd v. Merit Loan Company of Shreveport, Inc. 253 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
Gulfco Finance Company of Livingston v. Lee 241 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Wendel v. Dixon Real Estate Company 232 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Botsay ex rel. Botsay v. Campanella 224 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Easterling v. EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 203 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Brady v. American Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Mexic Bros., Inc. v. Sauviac 191 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Succession of Foster 122 So. 2d 96 La. 1960
Hernandez v. Harson 111 So. 2d 320 La. 1959
Wells v. Joseph 101 So. 2d 667 La. 1958
Meraux v. R. R. Barrow, Inc. 52 So. 2d 863 La. 1951
164 , 38 L.R.A.,N.S., 982; , 74 So.
Smith v. Atkins 48 So. 2d 101 La. 1950
118 , 23 So, 94 ; , 74 So.
Henderson v. Marmande 177 So. 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Southern Casualty Co. v. Ross 153 So. 673 La. 1934
239 , , etc. As is well said in the early case of Adle v. Anty, 5 La.
Turner v. Ratcliff 152 So. 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Iberville Land & Securities Co. v. Hurdle 151 So. 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
241 , , where the jurisprudence of this state on that subject is reviewed at length.
First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. Coreil 146 So. 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
In our opinion we refused the attorney’s fees claimed on the following expression of the court, , 74 So.
First Nat. Bank of Ville Platte v. Coreil 145 So. 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Campti Motor Co. v. Box 136 So. 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
244 , , the court uses the following language on this question: “It is clear that where one has abused legal process and causes the property of a third person to be seized for the debts of another, and the third person is compelled to go into court to maintain his title to the property seized and to have the illegal pr
Krivos v. Simmons 134 So. 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
American Multigraph Sales Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co. 123 So. 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
The following quotations from authorities amply show that the above-principle of law is well founded in our jurisprudence: “Besides, the mere passing over this demand in silence was a rejection of it.” *357 , (p. 240), 74 So.
Opelousas Finance Co. v. Reddell 119 So. 770 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1929
Soniat vs. Whitmer, , 74 So.
Buelow v. Abell 121 So. 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Dalbey v. Continental Supply Co. 115 So. 807 La. 1928
Vaughn v. Kemp 4 La. App. 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
In the case of Soniat vs. Whitner, , 74 South.
Cathey, Inc. v. Henriques 4 La. App. 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
The cases of Soniat vs. Whitmore, , 74 South.
Alfano v. Franek 105 So. 598 La. 1925
244 , , the right of the plaintiff in injunction to recover the fees of his counsel for obtaining the release of his property from) an illegal seizure was likened to the right which a defendant in a conservatory writ has to recover such fees for dissolving the writ.
Bailey v. Williams 104 So. 197 La. 1925
236 , ; Ludeling v. Garrett, 50 La.
Washington Bank & Trust Co. v. Cowan-Kerr Lumber Co. 99 So. 881 La. 1924