DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board, 200 So. 681.

13 citing documents.

  • Gautreau v. Gautreau 697 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Hebert v. Southwest La. Elec. Mem. Corp. 667 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    2 Cir.), writ denied, See also Gilbert v. Heintz, 231 La.
  • Fontenot v. FARM BUREAU INS. COMPANIES 629 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    Le Rosen v. North Central Texas Oil Co., 169 La.
  • Arsht v. Davis 550 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Caldwell v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. INDIGENT DEFENDER BD. 475 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Bradley v. Manuel 252 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • All State Credit Plan Houma, Inc. v. Weidenbacher 234 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    715 (Orl.App., 1930); or whether the plaintiff is under some disability which prevents the suit, such as minority, interdiction, etc., (1st La.App., 1941).
  • American Bank & Trust Company v. French 226 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    715 (Orl.App., 1930); or whether the plaintiff is under some disability which prevents the suit, such as minority, interdiction, etc., (1st La.App., 1941).
  • Dyer v. Davis 189 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Article 927; Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board, La.App., .
  • Sanders v. P. & S. INSURANCE COMPANY 125 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    343, 344, 345 and 346; Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board, 1 Cir., 1941, .
  • Fields v. Rapides Parish School Board 81 So. 2d 842 La. 1955
    A supplemental and aifiended petition was filed in order to coihpty with the ruling of the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit in the case of Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board, La.App., , by which case we think the trial judge was bound.
  • State Ex Rel. Fields v. Rapides Parish School Board 79 So. 2d 312 La. 1955
    However, in fairness to relator’s counsel and the trial judge, we observe that it is evident that Fields was substituted as relator in the case in place of his wife, in order to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit in Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board, La.App., , by which the judge was unquestionably bound.
  • Casente v. Lloyd 68 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    342 ; Riche v. Ascension Parish School Board, La.App., ; Coker v. Harper, 8 La.App.