Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jacobs v. Jacobs, 74 So. 992.

86 citing documents.

Williams v. Cortney Co. 459 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Vega v. St. Bernard Water District No. 1 398 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. State, Department of Highways 339 So. 2d 780 La. 1976
South Texas Lloyds v. Guarantee Insurance Co. 299 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
O'Reilly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 230 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Lobell v. American Indemnity Co. 211 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Arnold v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. 190 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Distinguished Shively v. Hare 189 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Gros v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 183 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
PIGGLY-WIGGLY OP. WRHSE. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 174 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
Representative of such cases are the following: , 74 So.
Woods v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 172 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
LeNormand v. Hardware Mutuals Insurance 163 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Graham v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. 159 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Wollerson v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. 159 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Kilpatrick v. State 154 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Smith v. Henry 147 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
798 , (1956), the Supreme Court recognized and applied the rule that a motorist traveling by night is not charged with the duty of guarding against striking an unexpected or unusual obstruction, which he had no reason to anticipate he would encounter on the highway, , 74 So.
Ramsey v. Langston 140 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Mose v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania 134 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Peats v. Martin 133 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Holt v. All State Insurance 131 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Powell 131 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Puissegur v. Louque 113 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Suire v. Winters 97 So. 2d 404 La. 1957
McCraine v. James 95 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
e are: (a) That the way is reasonably safe for travel and free from defects and unlawful obstructions; (b) that those charged with the duty of keeping it so have exercised a proper degree of diligence in so doing; (c) that it will not be obstructed unlawfully or in such a manner as to cause an injury to him while he is in the exercise of due and reasonable care; * * *_» , 74 So.
Brooks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 91 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Blashfield's Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Volume 5-A, Section 3320, pp. 387-391; , 74 So.
Reeves v. State 80 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Vowell v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co. 86 So. 2d 909 La. 1956
Mershon v. Cutrer 85 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Dowden v. State ex rel. Department of Highways 81 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
these are: (a) That the way is reasonably safe for travel and free from defects and unlawful obstructions; (b) That those charged with the duty of keeping it so have exercised a proper degree of diligence in so doing; (c) that it will not be obstructed unlawfully or in such a manner as to cause an injury to him while he is in the exercise of due and reasonable care; * * , 74 So.
Dowden v. STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. 81 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Watts v. Spikes 60 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Woodall v. Southern Scrap Material Co. 40 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Anderson v. London Guarantee Accident Co. 36 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Hemel v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. 31 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Such cases are: , 74 So.
Phillips v. Central Surety Ins. 25 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Herring v. Holicer Gas Co. 22 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission 15 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Morales v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corporation 7 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
German v. City of New Orleans 3 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Gaiennie v. Co-Operative Produce Co. 199 So. 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Gaiennie v. Cooperative Produce Co. 199 So. 377 La. 1940
Moore v. Davis 196 So. 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Broussard v. Krause & Managan, Inc. 186 So. 384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
Among these are: (a) that the way is reasonably safe for travel and free from defects and unlawful obstructions.” , 74 So.
Squyres v. Baldwin 185 So. 14 La. 1938
Kirk v. United Gas Public Service Co. 170 So. 1 La. 1936
Thus: “The rule is well established in the jurisprudence of this state that a person using a public highway * * * has a right to presume and act upon the presumption, that the way is safe for ordinary travel, even at night.” , 74 So.
Duncan v. Pedarre 164 So. 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Blahut v. McCahil 163 So. 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
As a general rule, however, the driver of an automobile, going thirty miles an hour on a country road, at night, is guilty of negligence if he fails to slow down to a speed at which he can stop instantly when he becomes blinded by the headlights of an approaching automobile.” , 74 So.
Galbraith v. Dreyfus 162 So. 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
“ ‘A guest in an automobile is entitled to demand that his host shall exercise ordinary care for safety in driving the car.’ , 74 So.
Duncan v. Pedare 161 So. 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
The rule on the subject of the care which a , page 286, 74 So.
Hutchinson v. T. L. James & Co. 160 So. 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935