Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hanby v. Texas Co., 72 So. 933.
- Mitchell v. Clark 431 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Evangeline Drilling Co. v. Lawrence 243 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Succession of Simms 195 So. 2d 114 La. 1966
- Little v. Haik 163 So. 2d 558 La. 1964
- Succession of Rolling 127 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Clark v. Reed 122 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
- McGuffy v. Weil 120 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- Allen v. George 110 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Haney v. Dunn 96 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
-
Serio v. Chadwick
66 So. 2d 9
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
The syllabus of Hanby v. Texas Co. (Lake Front Oil & Gas Co., Intervener), 1916, , 72 So.
- Pattison v. Bryan 26 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1946
- Baker v. Baker 21 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Hatch v. Morgan 12 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Grimm v. Pugh
197 So. 641
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
“The defendant takes the position that since the oil and gas lease was executed by Pugh in favor of C. L. Gayle that parol evidence was inadmissible as tending to establish an interest in immovables, [ 72 So.
- Tomlinson v. Thurmon 181 So. 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
-
Ceromi v. Harris
175 So. 462
La. 1937
2275, 2276, 2292, 2440; , 72 So.
- Jackson v. Dominick 166 So. 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Carter v. Loeber 148 So. 673 La. 1933
- Lindner v. Cotonio 143 So. 286 La. 1932
- Lindner v. Cotonio 143 So. 286 La. 1932
-
Hall v. Spencer
131 So. 518
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
There is not any evidence tending to show that E. S. Hall was a fictitious person, and, with the exception of parol testimony, which was not admissible ( , 72 So.
- Succession of Walsh 131 So. 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
-
Palmer Corporation of Louisiana v. Moore
132 So. 229
La. 1930
280, 281 , it was said, with regard to an oil -and gas lease: “The granting of a mineral lease on property * * * constitutes a dismemberment of said property amounting to a partial alienation thereof ( , 72 So.
-
Liles v. Texas Co.
117 So. 229
La. 1928
190 , ; Higgens Oil & Fuel Co. v. Guaranty Oil Co, 145 La.
-
Wiley v. Davis
115 So. 280
La. 1927
207 , see Syllabus 13) and hence constitutes a dismemberment of said property amounting to a partial alienation thereof ( , 72 So.
- Freed Realty Co. v. Singer 5 La. App. 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
- Milburn v. Wemple 101 So. 132 La. 1924
- Shaw v. Watson 92 So. 375 La. 1922
-
Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's Heirs
91 So. 207
La. 1922
Ct. 576, 44 L. Ed. 729 , and the decisions of this court in Wadkins v. Atlanta & Shreveport Oil & Gas Co., not reported, , 72 South.
- De Moss v. Sample 78 So. 482 La. 1918