Pitre v. Talley
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 2, 1966 187 So. 2d 452; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 8, 1927 6 La. App. 218; La., May 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 474; La., February 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 177
Pitre v. Talley, 205 So. 2d 821 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967).
Cited by
- Bah v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. 925 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Steward v. Spears 557 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Messex v. Louisiana Department of Highways 302 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
- Flowers v. Brooks 287 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Deo Gracias v. Collins 236 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Continental Insurance Company v. Duthu 235 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
- Shephard v. Checker Cab Company 230 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
- Arnold v. Patterson 224 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
- Pitre v. Talley 208 So. 2d 317 La. 1968
- Pitre v. Talley 205 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Pitre v. Talley 205 So. 2d 818
Opinion text
CULPEPPER, Judge. For the reasons assigned in the companion appeal bearing the same title, La.App., 205 So.2d 818 , in which a separate judgment has been rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed, with the proviso that defendants are cast by both judgments for only the total sum of $2304.18 plus interest and costs. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants appellants. Affirmed with a proviso.