Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., 74 So. 541.

41 citing documents.

Yonter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 802 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Adams v. JE Merit Const., Inc. 712 So. 2d 88 La. 1998
Billiot v. BP Oil Co. 645 So. 2d 604 La. 1994
Bourque v. Bailey 643 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
International Harvester Credit v. Seale 518 So. 2d 1039 La. 1988
McHale v. Lake Charles American Press 390 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
933 , (1912), Louisiana jurisprudence has consistently held that punitive damages are not recoverable at civil law.
Gianakis v. Mayen 301 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
239 , (1963); and Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Revon v. American Guarantee & Liability Ins. Co. 296 So. 2d 257 La. 1974
In Miller v. Thomas, supra, after reviewing the decisions in Lomenick v. Schoeffler, Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., and Gaspard v. LeMaire, supra, as well as the earlier case of Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
LeBrane v. Lewis 292 So. 2d 216 La. 1974
249 (1917); Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Boutte v. Hargrove 290 So. 2d 319 La. 1974
In Miller v. Thomas, supra, after reviewing the decisions in Gaspard v. LeMaire, Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb., and Lomenick v. Schoeffler, supra, as well as the earlier case of Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Wells v. Woman's Hospital Foundation 286 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Articles 2317, 2320; Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Dognibene v. Dunham 286 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
es of the trial judge or jury in assessing awards in such cases as set forth in Art. 1934 of the Civil Code.” Article 1934(3) of the Louisiana Civil Code provides: “In the assessment of damages under this rule, as well as in cases of offenses, quasi offenses, and quasi contracts, much discretion must be left to the judge or jury * * *» In Vincent v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Miller v. Thomas 246 So. 2d 16 La. 1971
Article 1934(3) of the Louisiana Civil Code provides: “In the assessment of damages under this rule, as well as in cases of offenses, quasi offenses, and quasi' contracts, much discretion must be left to the judge or jury ^ * *,} As early as 1917, in Vincent v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Post v. Rodrigue 205 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
238 ; Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
American Steel Building Co. v. Brezner 158 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
433 (1952), Footnote 2, referring to cases which suggested that punitive damages may be allowed for malicious or wrongful attachment: "Yet in Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Ramsey v. Kallio 62 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
In support of plaintiffs' contention the following cases are cited: Vincent v. Morgan's L. & T. Ry., , 74 So.
Levy v. New Orleans Northeastern R. Co. 20 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Angelloz v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. 199 So. 656 La. 1940
448 ; Vincent v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Comfort v. Monteleone 163 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Johnson v. Sundbery 150 So. 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
641, 649 , and with Vincent v. Morgan’s Louisiana & Texas R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Dinet v. Orleans Dredging Co., Inc. 149 So. 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
138 ; Vincent v. M. L. & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Simmons v. Doullut & Ewin, Inc. 145 So. 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Counsel for plaintiffs refer to the case of Vincent v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Bearman v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 134 So. 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
App. 691 ; Vincent v. M. L. & T. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Myers v. Gulf Public Service Corp. 132 So. 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Finnin v. Balter 122 So. 716 La. 1929
558 ; Vincent v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Moulin v. Monteleone 115 So. 447 La. 1927
& T. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 So.
Rousseau v. Texas & Pacific 4 La. App. 691 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1926
Smith v. Timon 2 La. App. 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Vincent vs. M. L. & T. R. & S. Co., , 74 South.
Claverie v. Lorenz 1 La. App. 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
vs. Morgan’s L. & T. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Mundy v. Phillips 102 So. 519 La. 1924
Vincent v. Morgan’s, etc., R. Co., , 74 So.
Janssen Catering Co. v. Abadie 102 So. 428 La. 1924
Vincent v. Morgan’s R. Co., , 74 So.
Hanna v. Otis 92 So. 360 La. 1922
Hebert v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 91 So. 406 La. 1922
v. M., L. & T. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Nash v. Longville Lumber Co. 83 So. 771 La. 1920
830 ; Vincent v. Morgan’s L. & T. R. Co., , 74 South.
Godchaux v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 81 So. 706 La. 1919
& T. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Dunson v. Baker 80 So. 238 La. 1918
Vincent v. Morgan, Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co., , 74 South.
Howell v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. 80 So. 613 La. 1918
& Texas R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Burt v. Shreveport Ry. Co. 76 So. 723 La. 1917
Vincent v. Morgan’s L. & T. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Alessi v. Town of Independence 76 So. 792 La. 1917
See Vincent v. M. L. & T. R. R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Lee Lumber Co. v. Union Naval Stores Co. 77 So. 131 La. 1917
from that ■point of view, and because the contract itself specifies the amount to be paid for timber killed by defendant’s operations, and not immediately felled by it and delivered for shipment to plaintiff, and also because it has recently been held by this court that our system of law does not authorize the infliction of punitory damages in civil suits (Vincent v. Morgan’s R. & S. S. Co., , 74 South.
Serio v. American Brewing Co. 74 So. 998 La. 1917

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by