No. 22212 Precedential Affirmed. Processed

State v. Nejin

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed October 16, 1916 · 74 So. 202

Cited by

Smith v. State ex rel. Collector of Revenue 100 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1958
State v. Magnolia Packing Co. 35 So. 2d 422 La. 1948
State v. Service Galvanizing Works 1 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
International Harvester Co. of America, Inc. v. Shreveport Nu-Grape Bottling Co. 127 So. 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
State v. American Creosote Works, Inc. 112 So. 412 La. 1927
State v. Lanasa 92 So. 306 La. 1922
Ballard v. Kentwood Ice Mfg. & Bottling Works, Ltd. 85 So. 598 La. 1920

Opinion text

O’NIELL, J. The defendant was found guilty of operating a blind tiger, in violation of Act No. 8 of Í915, was sentenced to pay a fine and be imprisoned, and has appealed. He relies upon a bill of exceptions reserved to the overruling of his motion in arrest of judgment. The grounds urged in the motion and the issues presented in this appeal are identically like those in the case of State v. Emile, 74 South. 163 , ante, p. 829, No. 22210, in which the conviction and sentence were this day affirmed. Por the reasons assigned in that case, the conviction and sentence herein appealed from are affirmed.