No. 22222
Precedential
Peremptory writ of prohibition ordered, and defendant discharged.
Processed
State v. Leppert
State v. Leppert, 72 So. 979 (La. 1916).
Cited by
- FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River Fabricators 971 So. 2d 302 La. 2007
- State v. Smith 195 So. 523 La. 1940
- Charles Dennery, Inc. v. Barker Baking Co. 166 So. 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Ardis & Co. v. Veal-Winn Co. 149 So. 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Opposition of Hernandez Bros. v. Barry 147 So. 31 La. 1933
- In Re Receivership of Baldwin Lumber Co. 147 So. 31 La. 1933
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Lumber Co. 146 So. 743 La. 1933
Opinion text
O’NIELL, J. The facts of this case are stated fully in the opinion rendered this day in the case of State v. Daniel D. Moore (No. 22221), 72 South. 965 , 1 in re. Daniel D. Moore applying for writs of certiorari and prohibition. For the reasons assigned in that case, it is ordered that the rule issued herein be made absolute, that a peremptory writ of prohibition issue heroin,-directed to the judge of the Twenty-Fourth judicial district court, in and for the parish of East Feliciana, prohibiting further proceedings in the prosecutions complained of, and that the defendant, Leppert, be discharged. Ante, p. 281.