Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guidry, 76 So. 843.

27 citing documents.

Krielow v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry 125 So. 3d 384 La. 2013
See City of Alexandria, 57 So.2d at 674 ; , 76 So.
State v. Miller 857 So. 2d 423 La. 2003
State v. All Pro Paint & Body Shop, Inc. 639 So. 2d 707 La. 1994
at 758-59 , 57 So.2d at 674 ; , 76 So.
State v. All Pro Paint & Body Shop 618 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Rodriguez, supra; , 76 So.
Bruneau v. Edwards 517 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Taylor 479 So. 2d 339 La. 1985
State v. Rodriguez, supra ; , 76 So.
Adams v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES 458 So. 2d 1295 La. 1984
175 (1932); State v. Guidry, 142 La.422, (1917).
State v. Broom 439 So. 2d 357 La. 1983
State v. Union Tank Car Co. 439 So. 2d 377 La. 1983
State v. Rodriguez 379 So. 2d 1084 La. 1980
Woodard v. Reily 152 So. 2d 41 La. 1963
Feinblum v. Louisiana State Board of Optom. Exam. 97 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Patorno v. Department of Public Safety, Drivers' License Division 76 So. 2d 534 La. 1954
133, 137 , made the following pronouncement with respect to such administrative bodies: “* * * The question has arisen often, as to whether a statute which delegates'the authority to an administrative officer or board to find the facts upon which the law is to be applied is a delegation of judicial power; and the question has arisen often, as it arose in State v. Guidry, supra, [ , 76 So.
State v. Martin 189 So. 109 La. 1939
State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 182 So. 725 La. 1938
State ex rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority 182 So. 725 La. 1938
Gremillion v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 172 So. 163 La. 1937
“Plaintiff further assails the constitutionality of said Act No. 20 of the Second Extraordinary Session of 1934 on the grounds that it ‘is broader than its title, and contains more than one subject, and contains subjects when the title is not indicative of.’ “In the cá , 76 So.
State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Grace 166 So. 133 La. 1936
Williams v. Guerre 162 So. 609 La. 1935
ature-shall embrace but one object, and shall have a title indicative of such object.’ “The title of Act No. 27 reads as follows : ■“‘An Act to amend and re-enact Section-3542 of the Revised Statutes of Louisiana of 1870, relative to deputy sheriffs,, to repeal all-laws'or parts of law in conflict herewith; and to provide penalties: for the violation of this Act.’ “ , 76 So.
Succession of Watson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. 156 So. 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
675 , we find that: “Title of act need not mention means, method, or instrument by which it is intended to accomplish general purpose, and need not be an index to provisions of the act, but is sufficient if it goes into the subject so as to place all persons in interest upon reaonable notice to make inquiry into the statute itself.” , 76 So.
Dawkins v. Bazer 134 So. 238 La. 1931
State v. Carson Carbon Co. 111 So. 162 La. 1926
State v. Patterson 107 So. 106 La. 1926
State v. Craig 104 So. 744 La. 1925
432 , ; Gulf Refining Co. v. McFarland, 154 La.
Larrabee v. Landry 1 La. App. 629 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1925
914 ; State vs. Guidry, , 76 South.
Sealy v. Dussel 102 So. 581 La. 1924
It has been held that an act to establish the governmenii of the state embraces but a single subject or object, yet it includes all its institutions, all its statutes.” *489 , 76 So.
State v. Guidry 76 So. 849 La. 1917
PROVO STY, J. The accused is prosecuted under section 18 of Act 54, p. 126, of 1914, which makes it “unlawful for any person to knowingly or willfully take oysters, shells, or cultch, bedded or planted by a lessee under this act.” A first conviction was set aside by this court in April last (No. 22346, , 76 South.