Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Flanagan v. Land Development Co. of Louisiana, Ltd., 83 So. 39.

14 citing documents.

SUCCESSION OF CALDARERA v. Zeno 43 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Robinson v. Mafrige 86 So. 2d 72 La. 1956
Adsit v. Park, supra (possession in such case was through a third person by virtue of an oil and gas lease under which there was continuous production); , 83 So.
Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Pitre 196 So. 36 La. 1940
Cherry's Succession v. Metropolitan Life Ins. 176 So. 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
In Flanagan v. Land Development Company of La., Ltd., , 83 So.
Succession of Bibbins 152 So. 592 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1934
932 , 934, “may be invoked by any one at any time and anywhere.” ’ ” , 83 So.
Mire v. La Salle Realty Co. 146 So. 326 La. 1933
Byrne v. Commercial Security Co. 7 La. App. 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Third District Land Co. v. Smith 4 La. App. 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
13 ; Flanagan vs. Land Development Co., , 83 South.
Succession of Williams v. Land Development Co. 3 La. App. 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
There was judgment in 1920 in favor of the succession of Williams annulling the tax sale, and in favor of the Land Development Company against the succession of Williams for the price paid by the company at the tax sale and for all other taxes paid by it (Flanagan vs. Land Development Company of Louisiana, , 83 South.
Jones v. Crescent City Ice Manfg. Co. 3 La. App. 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Flanagan vs. Land Development Co., , 83 South.
Flanagan v. Land Development Co. of Louisiana, Ltd. 102 So. 411 La. 1924
tion was perpetuated, and from this judgment an appeal is taken to this court, where a motion to dismiss is made because this court is without jurisdiction ratione materise, the amount involved in the injunction proceeding being only $171.73.” , 83 So.
Carter v. Cambrice 1 La. App. 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
Ann. 647 .” In Flanagan vs. Land Co., , the Court said on p. 848: “The first question to be disposed of herein is that of jurisdiction in the Court below; for, if it was without jurisdiction to appoint the plaintiff administrator in the first instance, or later as dative testamentary executor, the entire proceedings by which he attempted to acquire the ca
Flanagan v. Land Development Co. of Louisiana, Ltd. 95 So. 607 La. 1923
Flanagan v. Land Development Co. 6 Pelt. 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1922