Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bonart v. Rabito, 76 So. 166.

22 citing documents.

WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. DERBES 436 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Derbes 436 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Criticized Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., Crowley v. Boutte 309 So. 2d 274 La. 1975
The substance of the holding in Jones v. Fleming, however, , 76 So.
American Bank & Trust Company v. Blue Bird Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. 279 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
See Bonart v. Robito [Rabito], , 141 La.
Metropolitan Bank of Jefferson v. American National Insurance Co. 242 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
New Ulm State Bank v. Moore 185 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
S.P. Weaver Lumber Supply Co. v. Ashford 12 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Central Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Oilfield Supply & Scrap Material Co. 12 So. 2d 819 La. 1943
Central Sav. B. T. Co. v. Oil Field Supply S. Mat. 12 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
W.F. Brown Sons v. Easterly 4 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Succession of Gravolet 193 So. 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Bouterie 169 So. 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
This principle has been firmly embedded in our jurisprudence since the leading, , 76 So.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 162 So. 31 La. 1935
Central Finance Co. v. Martin 157 So. 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
J. B. Beaird Corporation v. Johnson 152 So. 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Merchants' & Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson 142 So. 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Beshel v. N. O. Thrift Stores, Inc. 120 So. 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
986 , , and numerous others, not one of which is precisely in point, and, all of which, collectively falls short of establishing the proposition advanced.
Seymour & Co v. Artz 5 La. App. 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
207 ; Sadler vs. White, 14th Ann. 177; Bonart vs. Rabito, , 76 So.
First National Bank v. Turner 4 La. App. 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Bonart vs. Rabito, , 76 South.
WM. B. Thompson & Co. v. Sporl 107 So. 135 La. 1926
dealing with a continuing guaranty, but with a negotiable instrument duly signed, indorsed, and delivered, and pledged (i. e. negotiated) by the holder thereof to a holder in due course, without knowledge of any equities or private understanding^ (if there were any) between the parties who bound themselves thereon; , 76 So.
Mechanics & Metals Nat. Bank v. Warner 83 So. 228 La. 1919
Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Davies 80 So. 713 La. 1919
561 , and the Rabito Case, , 76 South.