Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meyer v. Comegys, 86 So. 307.

40 citing documents.

Richard Dale Neill and Gloria Neill v. Tom D. Coday and Amanda Rochelle Coday La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2026
Accordingly, questions of title and ownership may be determined in an action of boundary.8 So.
Bradford Land Company, L.L.C. v. Montagnet Properties 2, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
P&G, LLC v. Shingle Point, LLC 273 So. 3d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
4th Cir. 1991) ; Meyer v. Comegys , , 857, 86 So.
BRP LLC v. MC Louisiana Minerals LLC 196 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Marion E. Bourgeois v. Linden Interest La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Bourgeois v. Linden Interest 84 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Skillman v. Harvey 898 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Kevin Dale Griffin, Et Ux. v. Doris John Abshire, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Griffin v. Abshire 878 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Little Zion Baptist Church v. Dawson 856 So. 2d 1211 La. 2003
Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. 823 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Although the principles set forth in the following language may have had earlier origins, the 1920 Louisiana Supreme Court case of Meyer v. Comegys [ , 86 So.
Lamson Petroleum Corp. v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. 824 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
But the controlling consideration is the intention of the party or parties.” , 86 So.
Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc. 770 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc. 763 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Kimbrough v. Hirsch 736 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
TEXAS INTERN. PETRO. CORP. v. Delacroix Corp. 650 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Pelican Homestead & Sav. Ass'n v. SEC. First Nat. Bank 532 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Williams v. Baughman 477 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
art. 784 which defines the term “boundary marker” *743 as “a natural or artificial object that marks on the ground the line of separation of contiguous lands.” , 86 So.
Levraea v. Smith 424 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McCullin v. Sumners 401 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Namie v. State, Department of Highways 353 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cheramie v. Vegas 273 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Arnaud v. Barber 225 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Crane v. Sun Oil Co. 223 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
636 ; Meyer v. Comegys, 1920, , 86 So.
Sagrera v. Mouton 180 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Union Bank v. Roy 182 So. 2d 319 La. 1965
Hulin v. Hale 137 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
1 Cir., ], supra; , 87 So.
Michael v. State 129 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
In Meyer v. Comegys, 1920, , 86 So.
Boudreaux v. Shadyside Co. 111 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Cf., the often quoted summary by Judge Dawkins, Sr., , at page 857, 86 So.
Travis v. Bridges 110 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Owens v. T. Miller & Sons Building Supply Co. 101 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Roberson v. Green 91 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Ryan v. Laprairie 84 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1956
Carlisle v. Graves 64 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Aucoin v. Marcel, supra; , 87 So.
Aucoin v. Marcel 38 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
'But the controlling consideration is the intention of the parties', , 86 So.
City of New Orleans v. Joseph Rathborne Land Co. 24 So. 2d 275 La. 1945
Sharpless v. Adkins 22 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Dufrene v. Bernstein 181 So. 859 La. 1938
“But the controlling consideration is the intention of *71 the party or parties.” , 86 So.
Haas v. Guillory 5 La. App. 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
852 , , the Supreme Court held that when the measurement and acreage called for in an act are in conflict, the measure which the body is said to have, prevails over the acreage which the measure is said to contain.
Nattin v. Glassell 100 So. 609 La. 1924