Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite E. B. Hayes Machinery Co. v. Eastham, 84 So. 898.

32 citing documents.

Falcon Drilling Co. v. Transamerican Energy, Ltd. 622 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Beninate v. Bruno 497 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Edco Properties v. Landry 371 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Davis v. PIONEER BANK & TRUST COMPANY 272 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
State v. Morales 240 So. 2d 714 La. 1970
Apex Sales Company v. Abraham 201 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Pico v. New Orleans Shrimp & Fish Co. 181 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Town of Eunice v. Trinity Universal Insurance 123 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Quarles v. Albritton 116 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
State v. Peterson 95 So. 2d 608 La. 1957
solido for the debts of the partnership.” The above article was interpreted as to commercial partners, , 84 So.
Trappey v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 86 So. 2d 515 La. 1956
Trappey v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 77 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
A partnership is a “legal entity entirely separate and distinct from the persons who compose it, and may have its own creditors and debtors to the same extent as the individual partners.” , 84 So.
Harrison v. Frye 46 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Holzer Sheet Metal Works v. Reynolds Marshall 43 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Rheuark v. Terminal Mud & Chemical Co. 35 So. 2d 592 La. 1948
I. L. Lyons Co. v. Southland Ballroom 24 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Furthermore, it is contended that no suit can be brought against the individual partners until the dissolution of the partnership, , 84 So.
Superior Merchandise Corporation v. Oser 8 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Elfer v. Mintz 7 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Klotz v. Tru-Fruit Distributors 173 So. 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
“Under the civil law, which prevails in this state, a partnership is a legal entity entirely separate and distinct from the persons who compose it, and may have its own creditors and debtors to the same extent as the individual partners.” , 84 So.
Green v. Hawkins & Antoon 144 So. 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
In matters relative to partnership, as long as the partnership continues, in all suits concerning it the parties must be cited to -appear before the tribunal of the place where it is established, or if there are several establishments, before that of the place where the obligation was entered into.” , 84 So.
Donohoe Oil & Gas Co. v. MacK-jourden Co. 144 So. 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
the partnership continues, in all suits concerning it the parties must) be cited to appear before the tribunal of the place where it is established, or if there are several establishments, before that of the place where the obligation was entered into.” , 84 So.
Siren v. Montague 142 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
u ⅜ * * The suits should not be brought in the names of the individual partners.” , 84 So.
Commercial & Savings Bank v. Quality Shop 141 So. 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
In passing on this question, , 84 So.
Resor v. Capelle 140 So. 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Homer Electric Shop v. J. D. Waldrip & Son 139 So. 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. Oakley 138 So. 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
First Natl. Bank v. Knighton Bros. 134 So. 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Snyder v. Davison 134 So. 89 La. 1931
Lee Hardware Co. v. Maxwell 130 So. 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
352 , ; also American Photo Player Co. v. Simon, 151 La.
Snyder v. Davidson 129 So. 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Budreaux 119 So. 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Co. vs. Eastham et al., , 84 So.
American Photo Player Co. v. Simon 92 So. 307 La. 1922
* * * ” But, “of course, in such a proceeding the individual * * * liabilities of partners, * * * not made parties thereto by service of process, are not * * * concluded by such decree.” 353 , 84 South.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by