DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lanza v. De Ridder Coca Cola Bottling Co., 3 So. 2d 217.

15 citing documents.

  • Wiley v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 205 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    1st Cir. 1942); (La.App.
  • Hudnall v. Travelers Insurance Co. 148 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    54 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Watkins v. Gulf Refining Co., 206 La.
  • Bonura v. Barq's Beverages of Baton Rouge 135 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    In the case of Lanza v. DeRidder Coca Cola Bottling Company, La.App., , this court reaffirmed its holding in the Gulf Public Service Company cases, supra, by again holding that: "Under this finding of fact we think the trial judge was correct in applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur as was done in the case of Auzenne v. Gulf Public Service Co., La.App., 181 So.
  • Sanders v. P. & S. INSURANCE COMPANY 125 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    App. 1 Cir., 1941, ; White v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company, La.App.
  • Saunders v. Walker 86 So. 2d 89 La. 1956
    512 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Meyers v. Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., La.App., ; Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Works, 199 La.
  • Redmond v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company 76 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    512 (Writs denied); Lanza v. De Ridder Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., First Circuit, ; Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Works, 199 La.
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 63 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In fact, this case could practically be paraphrased from the language used in the Ortego case, Boucher v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., La.App.1950, and in Lanza v. De Ridder Coca Cola Bottling Company, La.App.1941, .
  • Mayerhefer v. LOUISIANA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. LTD. 52 So. 2d 866 La. 1951
    599 , ; Lanza v. DeRidder Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Hake v. Air Reduction Sales *327 Co., 210 La.
  • Boucher v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 46 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    App., ; Lanza v. DeRidder Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Auzenne v. Gulf Public Service Co., La.App., 181 So.
  • Piacun v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 33 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Lewis v. American Brewing Co. 32 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , and White v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.
  • Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co. 28 So. 2d 441 La. 1946
    512 ; Lanz v. DeRidder Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Meyers v. Alexandria Coca Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., La.App., ; Ortego et al. v. Nehi Bottling Works et al., 199 La.
  • Duplantier v. City of Baton Rouge 23 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    and approved the finding of the trial judge that the defendant had failed to rebut the prima facie presumption of negligence where the nature of the evidence offered to rebut the presumption was more or less of a negative nature, i. e., that the Coca Cola was bottled according to a formula and under approved methods
  • Meyers v. Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 8 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    512 , , and held the defendant liable.
  • Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Works 6 So. 2d 677 La. 1942