No. 2253 Precedential Processed

Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Hebert

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed May 3, 1968 · 210 So. 2d 379

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 16, 1966 186 So. 2d 683; La., April 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 314

Cited by

Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé 210 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé 210 So. 2d 375

Opinion text

FRUGÉ, Judge. For the reasons given in the consolidated case of Michigan Pipe Line Company v. Frugé, 210 So.2d 375 (La.App. 3d Cir., 1968), it is hereby ordered that his case be remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of joining Vorice Hebert as a party defendant to this suit. It is further ordered that upon the remand of this case, the trial judge shall receive pleadings and evidence for the purpose of determining what, ■ if any, damages Mr. Hebert has sustained to his irrigation system as a result of the expropriation and that the case be resubmitted to this court on briefs as soon as the determination of the above matter is made, so that we may determine the merits of these appeals. Reversed and remanded.