DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doullut v. Rush, 77 So. 110.

13 citing documents.

  • Shepard v. Mayer 718 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In support Blanchard quotes at length from'the 1917 case of Doullut et al v. Rush, et al, , 77 So.
  • Seeling v. Seeling 125 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Trist v. Ravain 98 So. 2d 169 La. 1957
  • Newman v. Gumina 72 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
  • Brunies v. Morlet 28 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1946
  • State v. Boagni 27 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • King v. Holversen 17 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
  • Scully v. Pierce Bouvier 129 So. 675 La. 1929
  • Koshland v. Jones 118 So. 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    App. 20 , and in Doullut vs. Rusch, , 77 So.
  • Byrd v. Cooper 117 So. 441 La. 1928
  • Bohanon v. Stewart 4 La. App. 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    There is nothing in the Doulut-Rush case, , opposed to these views.
  • Church v. Taylor 3 La. App. 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Respondent’s second contention, regarding the inapplicability of Act 112 of 1916 to the facts or issues now before us, seem amply supported by the opinion rendered in Doullut vs. Rush, , 77 South.
  • Overruled Doullut v. Rush 80 So. 665 La. 1917
    The appellants’ right to a suspensive appeal was disposed of adversely to them by the decision rendered in the case No. 22689, M. P. Doullut et al. v. Mary Rush et al., In re M. P. Doullut et al., Applying for Certiorari, etc., , 77 South.