Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Washington v. Holmes Barnes, 5 So. 2d 195.

6 citing documents.

Moore v. Aysen 69 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
“We began the application of this interpretation of the compensation law in the recent case of Washington v. Holmes & Barnes, Limited, La.App., , and Id., [La.App.,] , where we gave reasons for our ruling.
Sims v. Prieto's Estate 47 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
This view is in accordance with the interpretation of the compensation law in the following cases: Vilce v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.App., ; Washington v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd., La.App., , Id., La.App., ; Barentine v. W. R. Aldrich & Company, La.App., ; Williams v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, La.App., .'
Richardson v. American Employers' Ins. Co. 32 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., , and also in the cases of Barentine v. W. R. Aldrich Co., La.
Vilce v. Travelers Ins. Co. 24 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App., , and Id., , where we gave reasons for our ruling.
Williams v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 21 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Barentine v. W. R. Aldrich Co. 20 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
In the recent case of Washington v. Holmes Barnes, Ltd., et al., and , we discussed this question thoroughly and found in that case that the disability of the employee on account of an injury to his left arm incapacitated him to the extent of about 20 per cent, and we gave him the minimum of $3 per week for a period not exceeding 300 weeks.