Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tremont Lumber Co. v. May, 78 So. 650.

24 citing documents.

South Central Bell Tel. Co. v. Traigle 367 So. 2d 1143 La. 1978
Co. v. Currie, supra; Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Police Jury of Natchitoches Parish, supra; Tremont Lumber Co. v. May, Assessor, , 78 So.
Hodges v. Hodges 150 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Sollie v. Means 58 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
It was so declared in the case of Tremont Lumber Company v. May, Assessor, , 78 So.
King v. Burris 57 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
C. W. Greeson Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp. 54 So. 2d 528 La. 1951
Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co. 37 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1948
165 ; Tremont Lumber Co. v. May, Assessor, et al., , 395, 78 So.
Seale v. Stephens 29 So. 2d 65 La. 1946
83, 87 , contains the statement that “Amendments should be allowed, even after issue joined, when they tend to the furtherance of justice, and do not retard the case.”, , 78 So.
Levin v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. 2 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Burglass v. Burglass 193 So. 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
There was a time in this State when a petition which failed to disclose a cause of action could not be amended because as Judge Provosty stated in Tremont Lumber Company v. May, 1918, , *276 78 So.
Drewett v. Carnahan 172 So. 6 La. 1937
It was so declared in the case of Tremont Lumber Co. v. May, Assessor, et al., , 78 So.
Miami Corporation v. State 173 So. 315 La. 1936
In the overruled case it had been held: “Our conception of the law is that a petition which does not allege a cause of action is, legally speaking, no petition, and hence it cannot be amended.” That expression was taken, verbatim, from the opinion rendered, originally, in Tremont Lumber Co. v. May, Assessor, , 78 So.
Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York 168 So. 488 La. 1936
165 ; Tremont Lumber Company v. May, Assessor, et al., , 78 So.
Payton v. Ideal Savings & Homestead Ass'n 160 So. 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
165, 166 , in which it was said that: “ * * * A petition which does not allege a cause of action is, legally speaking, no petition, and hence it cannot be amended.” *649 When the Supreme Court used this language, , 78 So.
Tuck v. Harmon 151 So. 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Iberville Trust & Saving Bank v. City Café 151 So. 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 151 So. 193 La. 1933
772 ; and Tremont Lumber Co. v. May, Assessor, , 78 So.
Iberville Trust Savings Bk. v. City Caf&200 150 So. 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Overruled Alphonse Brenner Co., Inc. v. Frumer 149 So. 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Comeaux v. Savoy 146 So. 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Lyons Planning Mills v. Guillot 146 So. 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
The recitals in these notes, as annexed documents, became part of the pleadings, , 78 So.
Terzia v. the Grand Leader 145 So. 363 La. 1932
Lotz v. Hurwitz 141 So. 83 La. 1932
Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. J. D. Mahoney Transfer Co. 139 So. 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
394 , , the court held that documents annexed to and made part of a petition are considered as read in the petition, but that documents cannot be considered as amplifying the petition which are 'merely made part by reference.
Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Hollingsworth 105 So. 57 La. 1925